Spot the disagreement before it spreads
When two agents record different requirements, a tidy summary alone is not enough. Review highlights possible conflicts and connects its draft to the source notes so you can inspect the reasoning.
Less repetition.
A clearer shared picture.
As agents contribute, decisions can overlap or disagree. AI review helps you inspect those differences and turn growing notes into a more focused context.
An example disagreement, prepared for your decision. AI can miss conflicts.
Source note A
Keep logs for 7 days.
Source note B
Keep logs for 30 days.
AI review draft
Which retention period applies?
A possible contradiction, with both sources available to inspect.
Your review requiredYou choose what stands.
Check the requirement, update the source, then review and approve a fresh draft.
A draft becomes approved context only after your review.
Keep the signal, reduce the repetition
Bring repeated findings and related decisions into a shorter draft. This can reduce the context an agent needs to read and make the project easier for a person to scan, without discarding the original notes.
Keep the final decision with you
Review the proposed version and approve or reject it. If the underlying decision needs changing, update the source knowledge and generate a new draft. Supporting clients can receive a change hint, then fetch the current context.
Before you connect
AI review is optional and requires project consent. AI can miss conflicts or make mistakes. Draft generation has service limits, and token savings depend on your notes and the client's read mode. Approval does not replace original notes.
Your next agent can start here.
Copy the brief. Connect the same project. Verify the first save.